Jemima Khan Without Pants

BASS · 02-13-2008, 03:27 AM

Jemima khan does a britney and goes out flashing with no pants on. Why are these celebs flashing?

/*
images removed
*/

Hey Bass,

Following a request from Google, images have been removed and replaced with a more glamorous image of Jemima.

Message to all other posters to the Kitmeout forum. Please ensure all images conform to an acceptable level of decency. Please note, content containing lewd or provocative poses, or close-ups of breasts, butts, or crotches are not permitted.

Thanks.

adero · 02-13-2008, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BASS

JEMIMA KHAN DOES A BRITNEY AND GOES OUT FLASHING WITH NO PANTS ON. WHY ARE THESE CELEBS FLASHING?

cause I have never heard of her but now I have.
that's way....

Pringle · 02-13-2008, 01:22 PM

Nice carpet is all I'll say regardless of the moral issues.

Daveheadhunt · 02-16-2008, 09:14 AM

That is just tragic! Jemima was a real stunner and then she got kipnapped by Khan as a teenager and now look at her!

getcaned · 12-08-2010, 07:46 AM

she is stunning

so whats the deal with wikileaks?

volley · 12-08-2010, 07:48 AM

she is a real fashionista. i love her style. so elegant

Amsterdam · 12-08-2010, 10:59 AM

She helped with the bail payment:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was in a British prison last night after a parade of celebrity supporters failed to secure his freedom.
The 39-year-old ex-computer hacker, behind the release of 250,000 leaked files on the internet, was refused bail and remanded in custody by a London magistrate – facing extradition to Sweden over allegations of rape and sexual assault.
In a court hearing, film director Ken Loach, Jemima Khan, and journalist John Pilger pledged £20,000 each to stand as surety for his bail, as did two more human rights supporters. Two other, unnamed backers were willing to promise a further £100,000 between them.

usaTaylor · 12-08-2010, 12:23 PM

there is something really odd going on with the whole thing.

**Dunnymonster** · 12-08-2010, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by usaTaylor

there is something really odd going on with the whole thing.

One of 2 possibilities here, either Assange is completely innocent and he has simply been framed for these offences to discredit him by somebody because he leaked the information on the net, or very cleverly he is guilty of the offences and decided to post the Wiki Leaks info , knowing such an act would cause a stir and create the impression he was framed, thus creating the story he was in fact innocent and set up. Who knows what is true?

done-diesel · 12-08-2010, 11:02 PM

even the truth is a lie