Agent Provocateur

[pinoni]

Originally Posted by doughnut

much better. thank you!

well said sister

[CD]

Originally Posted by robinakira

Hello,

Can't answer that, not sure on the company ownership, I know who owns it but do not know who has 'invested' in the brand or who does there corporate PR.....

there is a lot of this kind of deal making more than I feel comfortable about and it mainly in the UK and USA, in Japan the relationships are more 'family' and the inter-relationship between companies are better understood and know.

this stuff is BAD for the business and should be stopped, it assumes that the punters are stupid and all the companies will keep there mouth shut about it ( the second is sadly true). Clothing business is a bit too scared of it's self, all Emperor new clothes stuff, if no one says anything then no one looks stupid, truth is it's a few bigger companies trying to screw over the customers and make themselves feel bigger than they are and the power of the PR spin.

RAC

Didn't we talk about this when Kickers was classed as a 'Superbrand'?? Or was this something else?

[CD]

Originally Posted by dumb5

maybe kitmeout should do "the objective fashion rewards"

What an idea dumb!!

As Nike would say - JUST DO IT!!

[CD]

Originally Posted by done-diesel

the idea is good but it needs to be streamlined so just a few cats: designerwear, streetwear and footwear in mens and womens groups.

Yes I think I agree BUT maybe they could be a bit too general? designer wear - what would this be classed as?

I like the idea of mens & womens groups.

I also feel accessories needs a role - as these add so much to fashion and deserve a cat on their own.


Someone mentioned DENIM. This sounds good but again what is classed as a 'denim brand'?

Whatever the cats a definition of each one needs to be explained for each.

How about one for the WORST brand?


Get this up and running by the end of the year -
KMO Awards 2008...........I can see BBC Three paying good money to broadcast this!